Politicians often derail initiatives. Some authorities asserted that they were safeguarding the character and property values of a community. Others claimed to be combating corporate greed. Julie Won, a City Council member with a left-leaning ideology, said on Friday that she will reject a major new project in her Queens district, calling it a “gentrification accelerator.”
However, a housing scarcity and affordability issue may alter the political calculation of certain progressives who have been among the most ardent opponents of the real estate sector historically.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who opposed the construction of an Amazon campus near her district, recently stated that she would support local officials who pave the way for more housing, and a number of left-leaning City Council members have embraced new developments, even when the majority of the units would not be affordable for working-class New Yorkers.
Queens councilwoman Tiffany Cabán, a democratic socialist, recently voted in favour of a plan to construct over 1,300 units on an empty waterfront parcel in her district. A quarter of the flats will rent for less than the market rate.
Ms. Cabán said that she would prefer public housing or homes owned by locals, but “it’s not as simple or straightforward as 100% inexpensive or nothing.” She said that not allowing the Halletts North project would result in the property languishing as a truck depot or parking lot for delivery trucks, which was “very irresponsible” given the housing need.
The real estate lobby has always been a significant force in New York politics. The mayor, Eric Adams, has been sympathetic to the developers’ political contributions. The sector as a whole continues to be profitable, and new buildings are rising around the city in areas where the regulations enable denser growth.
However, members of the City Council have considerable authority in deciding the destiny of new projects, with neighborhood-specific factors taken into account. They often oppose new construction unless perks, such as parks or community space, are provided, and may occasionally shut down projects entirely if they do not get the concessions they want for their neighbourhoods.
Many housing activists and more moderate Democrats, including President Biden and Mayor Adams, have urged for a concerted push to develop additional housing in light of the nation’s housing affordability and homelessness crises.
Leaders in other regions of the nation, such as California’s Governor Gavin Newsom, have more aggressively implemented measures to boost home building and overcome opposition from local governments and activists.
Some New York left-leaning groups’ openness to increased construction may indicate that the political momentum behind the pro-housing movement is building and may portend big changes to the city’s landscape.
There is a lack of houses accessible to New Yorkers of all income levels, but the situation is particularly severe for those with lower incomes. According to a May estimate by Up for Growth, a Washington policy and research organisation, the New York metropolitan region need more than 340,000 extra dwellings in 2019.
According to Douglas Elliman, the vacancy rate for apartments renting for less than the citywide median of $1,500 is less than 1 percent, while a lack of inventory has pushed the average asking rent for a market-rate apartment in Manhattan beyond $4,000.
More over fifty percent of the city’s renters pay more than one-third of their income on rent. Last week, the population of the city’s primary homeless shelter system surpassed a record, spurred in part by migrants arriving in the city and in part by an increase in residents seeking refuge.
Maria Torres-Springer, deputy mayor for economic and work force development, said, “If we delay the measures, investments, and bravery required to confront our housing problem, we will not only jeopardise the well-being of families, but also the economic recovery and long-term recovery of our city.”